Is it the most iconic Art Nouveau building in Riga? Most probably - yes. Huge sculptural faces which tops this building's facade is often used as a symbolizing picture of Riga
Is it the most iconic Art Nouveau building in Riga? Most probably - yes. Huge sculptural faces which tops this building's facade is often used as a symbolizing picture of Riga, from tourism brochures to art history books.
Buiding's sculptures symbolizes the struggle between world's rational and chaotic forces. Also the building itself is like a symbol of contradictions - both in regard to it’s artistical qualities, as well as to it’s author’s, architect’s Mikhail Eisenstein’s creativity, talent and originality.
Architecture experts still tend to denounce Eisenstein’s buildings as too pompous, frivolous, created for a cheap popularity. They really may seem like an overdecorated Christmas trees - just a very posh facades with no relation to the “real soul of the architecture”. However, if we take this argument as valid, we can go further and say that any external decorations or even plays of forms which doesn’t strictly follows the rule “form follows function” aren’t a part of architecture and are unnecessary. And that is a dangerous step to take - because the next one would lead to the disastrous mistakes the architecture made in 1960ies - 1970ies.
Next contradiction is related to the originality of the building’s design. As told, Elizabetes street 10b is one of Eisenstein’s most impressive and most famous buildings. However, two other author names should be mentioned besides him regarding to this building - it’s known that Eisenstein used the sketches from some architecture drawings collection, designed by Leipzig architects Georg Wünschmann and Hans Kozel. This fact (together with similar facts about some other Eisenstein buildings) has sparked a harsh words in direction to Eisenstein and Riga’s “decorative eclectic Art Nouveau” in general - by calling it a cheap plagiarism, for example. But, as an art historian Silvija Grosa writes, using the pre-made sketches in architecture was a typical characteristic of that time. Furthermore, if we explore the building closely and compare it to Wünschmann and Kozel sketch, we can see that, although the main composition and structure of the facade is indeed copied, there are many smaller details added by Eisenstein. Eisenstein was not only an architect but also construction engineer - so his devotion was also the practical work of bringing these German architects/his own visions to life.
MAIN FACTS | |
---|---|
LOCATION | Latvia, Riga |
ARCHITECTURE | Art Nouveau |
BUILT | 1903 |
ARCHITECT | Mikhail Eisenstein |
RATING (9/10) |
The duality concept
Architecture experts still tend to denounce Eisenstein’s buildings as too pompous, frivolous, created for a cheap popularity. They really may seem like an overdecorated Christmas trees - just a very posh facades with no relation to the “real soul of the architecture”. However, if we take this argument as valid, we can go further and say that any external decorations or even plays of forms which doesn’t strictly follows the rule “form follows function” aren’t a part of architecture and are unnecessary. And that is a dangerous step to take - because the next one would lead to the disastrous mistakes the architecture made in 1960ies - 1970ies.
Post A Comment:
0 comments: